Octomom Forced To Pose Nude For $10,000

Octomom Forced To Pose Nude For $10,000

Octomom has gone back on her word and posed nude for money.  The mother of 14, Nadya Suleman, who really wants to be Angelina Jolie, was faced with homelessness and so accepted the $10,000 offer from the European mag, ‘Closer.’  The mag is no closer to our hearts now that they have taken advantage of the poor woman.

Whatever you think of Octomom, there is something very disturbing about a single mother being forced to pose nude for money in order to survive.

Octomom said:   “I’m doing that because I need to feed my kids.  I need to pay bills. And I’m very cognizant of the repercussions of my choices.”

Let this be a lesson to us all – don’t have 14 kids unless you have Angelina Jolie’s money.

TMZ has exclusive detailsOctomom is so desperate for money, she did what she swore she would never do — pose nude for cash.  Nadya Suleman is days away from being homeless … the house she owns that has been in and out of foreclosure for more than a year will be sold at an auction Thursday … so Octo needs a new crib for her brood … stat.

The dilemma — getting first and last month’s rent together, so Octo has gone naked.  She posed for the European magazine, “Closer.”   Sources tell TMZ … Octo got $10,000 for the shoot, which is what she needs to rent a new place.

Octo is being very up front now about some misgivings about having 14 kids, saying, “I’m doing that (posing nude) because I need to feed my kids.  I need to pay the bills.  And I’m still very cognizant of the repercussions of my choices.”

It’s not the first time Octo has been offered cash for skin … porn giant Vivid Entertainment offered Suleman a $1,000,000 contract back in 2009 … which she rejected.

Pornography – prostitution – it is all the same.  People suspend their respect for their fellow humans.  What do you think?  Are you pleased that Octomom has been reduced to posing nude for money?  Let us know in the comments below.



  • Pingback: The Octomom's Million Dollar X-Rated Film Career Ruined By Topless Photos | Celeb Dirty Laundry

  • Anon

    “The mag is no closer to our hearts now that they have taken advantage of the poor woman.”
    Really?! How dare you accuse them of taking advantage of her just because she broke one of her convictions! They did not take advantage of her, they offered her money for a damn photo shoot, if she didn’t want to do it she should have said no! and let’s be honest here, she was not FORCED to pose for any pictures. There was no person with a gun to her head telling her to take her clothes off for the camera. If she needed money so badly she shouldn’t have told her doctor to implant six embryos in her when she was unemployed for six years and already had six kids, or she shouldn’t have stated in an interview “I hate babies, they disgust me… Obviously, I love them—but I absolutely wish I had not had them.” She should have had the sense to not get herself into $1mil worth of debt when she only had half as much to spend. She is not fit to be a mother and is lucky that this magazine offered her a photo shoot at all.