Kourtney Kardashian was recently under a lot attention [when isn’t she, really?] when it was reported that her ex-boyfriend/male model Michael Girgenti had gone to In Touch Weekly to claim that he’s the father of her three year old son Mason, not her long-time boyfriend Scott Disick. Although Kourtney’s attorney has dismissed the claims as ridiculous and preposterous, Michael is standing by his claim and asking for Mason to take a paternity test. Now, in another twist, Radar Online is reporting that Mason has been caught in a lie, and some of his claims don’t match up.
First of all, let’s look at the fact that Michael claims to have had sex with Kourtney in April of 2008, following the photo shoot for 944 Magazine. Now, Kourtney had Mason in December of 2009. Yeah, the math doesn’t add up. The difference between April 2008 and December 2009 is not 9 months, it’s almost two years! That’s either the longest pregnancy in history, or dear Mr. Girgenti here can’t count.
We’re going with the version where he can’t count as that makes a lot more sense, especially following his subsequent claims. Now, Michael made these claims at the beginning of 2010 to Star Magazine, and said that he and Kourtney never spoke after their tryst. However, he contradicted himself a month later when he told Star in a follow-up interview that Kourtney sent him another email saying, “Last night was so much fun. But Scott’s bugging me again, and I don’t know what to do.”
So he’s basically been hounding the tabloids about this story since the fall of 2009, since the baby was born. However, he’d be a lot more believable if he could actually COUNT and realize that his whole story makes no sense. Also, since no one cared the first time, he’s now trying to famewhore his way back onto magazine covers by regurgitating the same crap and hoping people listen. Clearly, it’s working because In Touch has bought his story and we’re now talking about it.