Jamie Dornan is indignant on behalf of his penis. No full frontal shots in Fifty Shades of Grey for Mr. Christian Grey! Ok, that sounds terrible. But Mr. Dornan has gone on the record and stated that you will unequivocally NOT be seeing his genitals in Fifty Shades of Grey. Jeez, what kind of terrible soft core porn is this? The whole point of the Fifty Shades of Grey novels was to provide pleasure to women who weren’t getting it elsewhere, or as put more eloquently, f**ing mommy porn. And there is full frontal male nudity in mommy porn.
Anyway, Jamie Dornan covers the latest issue of The Observer Magazine, and he admits, “There were contracts in place that said that viewers wouldn’t be seeing my, um…Yeah, my todger.”
Ugh, I’m about to go on a sexist rant so oblige me. There are contracts stating that the audience wouldn’t be seeing Jamie’s ‘todger’, but you think the same view applied to Dakota Johnson? I have a feeling we’re going to be seeing all of her, but not all of Jamie? Isn’t that strange, considering that the primary audience for this film is going to be women – and women who definitely want to see male nudity above female nudity. We get enough female nudity in regular films and cable TV shows, thankyouverymuch.
It’s interesting – the more and more we hear about it, the more it seems like director Sam Taylor-Johnson has legitimately attempted to make a proper romance film out of what started out as glorified Twilight fan fiction with a side of BDSM thrown in. It’ll be interesting to see whether she’s actually succeeded.
Were you hoping to see Jamie Dornan naked?
Image credit to FameFlynet
