Michael Jackson Molested Macaulay Culkin Suggest FBI Files – MJ Was a Monster Pedophile

Michael Jackson Molested Macaulay Culkin Suggest FBI Files - MJ Was a Monster Pedophile

Although Michael Jackson has been dead for over four years, his craving for adolescent boys continues to haunt his reputation. Just days after Wade Robson started a fire storm and confessed to being the willing victim of sexual abuse from the biggest entertainer of all time, secret FBI files with over 1000 pages of raw pornographic stories are exposed.

True, we’re all guilty of watching porn with the mute button on sometimes, but these document details are horrendous. Especially since we can’t put his dancing, zigzag paper thin ghost on trial. Being the GOAT of Entertainment comes with a steep price: your eternal soul. The payouts prove his determination to hide the facts, or the industries’ determination to extort the Pop King.

Michael Jackson Molested Macaulay Culkin Suggest FBI Files - MJ Was a Monster Pedophile

R. Kelly is even shaking his head on this one. Michael Jackson paid off parents and victims of his sexual abuse. $35M was a big mac with cheese to the guy who couldn’t sleep. He paid to silence 24 Young Boys He Abused Over 15 Years to be exact. That breaks down to a boy and a half per year per. We don’t even have Christmas that often. Poor bubbles the monkey. He would never blab Michael’s secrets.

Despite Macaulay Culkin’s courtroom denials, this new evidence points strongly to him being one of MJ’s many victims.  Culkin’s desire to deny being molested by Jackson is easy to understand and totally forgivable. Could this victimization by the monster have been what led to Culkin’s eventual drug abuse and addiction?

Michael Jackson Molested Macaulay Culkin Suggest FBI Files - MJ Was a Monster Pedophile

Documents describe how the Thriller hit-maker was once caught by a member of his household staff “groping a world-famous child star”. I guess they were ‘Home Alone’ … “watching porn films while molesting another boy and fondling the genitals of a third in his private cinema,” Britain’s PEOPLE reported late on Saturday. The files, given to the FBI as part of its probe into detective Anthony Pellicano, name 17 boys – including five child actors and two dancers (Robson was one of the dancers) – whom Jackson abused.

In a transcript of one tape from 1993, Jackson’s ex-butler Philip LeMarque and his wife Stella detailed how screen legend Marlon Brando complained that the King of Pop would “disappear with the children” at his Neverland Ranch in Santa Barbara, California.

Stella said: “He’d come to the ranch and always see Michael playing, then disappear with the children.” Michael would never spend time with the adults at the ranch. The couple said Jackson would watch porn films with young boys in his private bedroom behind a secret wall.

Oddly Michael’s addiction didn’t stop after the first ‘set’ of accusations. Mr. Vitiligo was a recluse except when it came to prepubescent male children, but everyone loves little kids…right? Most adults however can’t afford to be in the company of Liz Taylor who introduced the insomniac to Detective Anthony Pellicano. Michael hired him, but he eventually quit. What would make somebody ‘quit’ working for Jacko? “I quit after I found out some truths. He did something far worse to young boys than molest them,” Pellicano stated. The glittery gloved one is rumored to be a “serial child predator”, and Anthony said “I have never worked on a case with as many potential claimants as the Jackson case”.

Paris Jackson is most affected, so far, by the awful truths about her daddy – and she can no longer hide behind her infamous masks.

Prince Michael, Paris, Blanket, please pack your bags, and move to Mars, and pray there is no Wi-Fi connection.

Michael Jackson Molested Macaulay Culkin Suggest FBI Files - MJ Was a Monster Pedophile



  • allie

    Why did Macaulay Culkin deny it?

    • drdebo cherry

      that is the most common response… lots of shame….kids, adolscents and adults deny it at first then slowly come to terms with the reality of it and “tell”.

      • carrie

        If it was true,why did Culkin keep contact with Jackson? Even adult?
        Why the FBI didn’t give the files to the Justice durong the trial?

        • Sue Adams

          Just for interest: Wade Robson went to Neverland with his family for a barbeque when he was 21 years of age, he and his wife Amanda asked Michael if they could film on Neverland – ‘sacred land’ – for a video and then thanked Michael for the use of same. Considering he would be at the same place as his “abuser” in the same place as he was “abused” , I would imagine, had his ‘abuse’ been genuine, the last thing Robson would have ever wanted was to be around Michael at Neverland specially by the time he was 21 years of age? Kinda strange isn’t it – leave that one with you!!

          He then went around bragging he was going to be doing both Immortal Tour and MJ One tributes, both of which Michael rightly chose Jamie King over Robson for these great tributes to Michael! Clearly Robson, having gone around bragging to everyone he was going to be a sure cert for producing/directing these, got serious ‘egg on his face’ and now he’s going all out in a case against MJ’s Estate – clearly blaming both Michael AND the Estate guys for a serious slump in his own career!

          Um, do I smell sour grapes per chance?!!!!

    • Sue Adams

      That’ll be because it’s not true – same goes for Brett Barnes!

  • Julia Berkowitz

    Amazing how the media can brainwash people and how they can slander someone to no end without evidence.

    1) These are not FBI files. MJ’s FBI files have been released in 2009 and are freely available on the FBI’s official website. They do not contain anything that the Mirror claims.

    2) The documents the Mirror posted come from tapaed conversations of a tabloid journalist, Jim Mitteager which were inherited by PI and tabloid broker, Paul Barresi. Barresi also thrown the in the mix the interview he did with the LeMarques in 1993 in order to sell their story to tabloids.

    3) It’s amazing how the media can act that the LeMarques’ claims are some new revelations which “prove” that MJ molested Macaulay Culkin. They are neither anything new, nor do they prove anything. Philip LeMarque was called to testify in 2005 and was utterly discredited on the stand. It’s clear they made up their story to sell it to tabloids and to cash-in on it. How can you claim that despite Culkin refuting them on the stand that these people’s words, who were proven to be not credible at all, somehow “prove” he was molested?

    4) The documents the Mirror posted do not prove what they claim in their article. There is no evidence in them that MJ paid off 24 boys.

    5) The allegation quoted in one of those documents that he paid off a boy in 1992 $600,000 turned out to be a fake story long time ago by a woman who tried to sell tabloid stories in 1993 and claimed to have worked for Jordan Chandler. It turned out to be not true and the boy named in the document does not even exist.

    6) Pellicano is in jail since 2002. He was quoted by a tabloid saying that and no context was given, which is always suspicious. You guys love to quote this one sentence but not that on the same day the same tabloid in another article about Pellicano said that Pellicano has incriminating evidence about Jackson’s accusers (and he does).

    7) The Mirror is also very selective in what they publish from the Mitteager tapes, that they now call “FBI files”. LOL. It’s actually full of information that exonerates Jackson. There’s a tape from September 1994 where Pellicano tells Mitteager how Jackson was innocent in the allegations. This was months after Pellicano left Jackson’s employment. Another part of the tapes prove how Mitteager, as a National Enquirer journalist offered $200,000 to a family back in 1993 to make up false child abuse allegations about MJ. Of course The Mirror won’t publish those.

    I’m utterly disgusted by what you guys are doing.

  • MeMe

    The actual FBI files, which were publicly released in 2009, fully substantiate Michael Jackson’s innocence. They seized dozens of hard drives from multiple properties and forensic analysis found absolutely no trace of any child porn. They followed-up on all leads and tabloid claims of other victims (some as early as the 1970s who claim to have had phone sex with MJ) and determined them all to be unfounded.

    What you are calling “secret FBI files” are really just the taped audio conversations between National Enquirer, Globe and other tabloids and those trying to sell any story they could come up with about Michael for hundreds of thousands of dollars. The LeMarques demanded more and more money and revised their stories as more money was offered, eventually accumulating to a demand of half a million dollars.

    The prosecutors spent millions of dollars investigating Michael Jackson for 10 years and had access to these tabloid recordings in 2003. They travelled the world and interviewed hundreds of children and adults looking for any credible victims. Every piece of this was entered into evidence as part of the “past bad acts” and the witnesses that conducted those tabloid interviews crumbled on the stand.

  • Pingback: Ireland Baldwin Bikini Beach Magazine Cover (Photo) | Celeb Dirty Laundry

  • Em Anne

    I’m just shaking my head wondering what it would take for some rabid fans to believe that Jackson was a child molester….he fits the profile perfectly, and there is no reason in the world that a grown man would spend so much time with children, much less sleep in the same bed.

    I predict that in the future, as it becomes safer to speak out, others will come forward…

    Many people don’t remember the abuse that happened-it is blocked out because it is too overwhelming, and also, you need to have a safe enough environment in order for you to remember….

    In Wade’s case he knew the facts but was not aware that it was abuse…..Cory Feldman just had the same kind of a realization not too long ago.

    Although he had always remembered Jackson showing him a book with pictures of genitilia when he was fourteen, he didn’t realize that was abusive until, I believe it was 2005…

    He said that it occurred to him, as an adult, that if someone did such a thing to a fourteen year old boy, it would be abuse.

    That’s the way the mind works….

    • Sue Adams

      Actually, as this child psychologist of 20 years clearly points out, you are very much wrong!!

      A child psychologist with over 20 years experience, defends Michael Jackson and talks about how Michael DID NOT FIT the pedophile profile

      Author: Stephen

      A more honest reappraisal would be that the crime of false accusation was committed against Michael Jackson. The man was virtually hounded to his death. And from what I can see from the largely rebutting responses on this post, it seems clear the true ‘fanatics’ as regards Michael Jackson – are his detractors.

      As a child pyschologist with over 20 years experience working in more crisis /abuse scenarios than I care to recall, I can assure you that simply participating in what amounted to ‘sleepovers’ is no evidence of pedophiliac behaviour. Contrary to what most people assume about pedophiles, the overriding personality trait they demonstrate is not their interest in children – but their spectacular disinterest.

      They are unable to perceive a child as being anything more than something to be used and dispensed with. This disinterest cannot be masked, it is part of the intrinsic make-up of child predators. There are no ‘ifs’ and ‘buts’ with this. Mr Jackson, far from using children, clearly felt great affection and concern for them. He may have over-identified with them, but he did not present as a molester to any social worker or child specialist I have come across.

      There isn’t a pedophile in the world with a track record of public works that Jackson had. He also clearly lavished healthy love and affection on his own children. The lack of corroborating evidence in 1993 and again in 2005, the lack of incriminating evidence over a 10 year period from the FBI investigation casts serious – if not fatal doubts, on the authenticity of both the accusations and the accusers themselves. …

      It was a clear case of – “well he’s odd so he must be guilty.”

      Diane Dimond, who I only know of from her inflammatory and clearly self-interested profile as a Jackson ‘expert’ has been successfully discredited over the years, and one can assume blogging nonsense such as this is the type of ‘bread and butter’ work her career has been reduced to – as a result of her persistent and regrettable misleading of the American public.

      This woman represents the results of the insidious ‘dumbing down’ of American life that led millions of people to allow their views and erroneous belief in a innocent man’s guilt to be masticated and served up for them.

      Wade Robson and the others mentioned here a bunch of self-serving, conniving, lying $$$$-fame grabbing whores and this website is clearly serving their needs more than adequately – bottom of the barrel fantasists/parasites!!

  • Pingback: Michael Jackson's Warning Alarm - Wade Robson's Horrifying Bedroom Revelations | Celeb Dirty Laundry

  • Pingback: Did Janet Jackson And Michael Jackson’s Siblings Know About His Sex Crimes And Help Cover Up? | Celeb Dirty Laundry

  • stupid

    well obviously something was up with macaulay he didn’t turn into a drug addict for no reason. though, i don’t get why we have to bring michael up from the dead, how is this late news going to help anyone.

  • stephtacular32

    Dude,watch the documentary.All those stories were made against MJ for some moolah.Hes not a child molester,and hes NOT GUILTY.

  • zach crutcher

    This is such bullshit when the police searched his home when he went on trial they found NO PORN in any of the computers. This is just crazy the tabloids won’t let the man rest in peace

  • SeanTheGreat

    who

  • SeanTheGreat

    wow if u do ur research thoroughly this article is pure bullshit…im not even a michael jackson fan

  • Sue Adams

    How dare you have the audacity to call this “new evidence” when it is NOTHING but a load of rehashed tabloid crap that all you lazy sleazy journos lazily cut and paste across the board!

    How DARE you say ANYTHING to or about Michael’s children – haven’t they suffered MORE THAN ENOUGH without this, the disgusting anti-MJ bandwagon sleazeball gravy $$$$$$$$ train!!!!

  • Sue Adams

    If you believe the bullshit dredged up by this website, you’re clearly injecting/smoking some bad something or other!!

  • Sue Adams

    If you believe the garbage written here – the ‘source’ of which “information” is governed by $$$$- and self-publicity whoring, then you must be very gullible!